Paul Thomas Anderson's 2002 film Punch-Drunk Love might seem to be a strangeĀ film to act as a bridge between what now seem to be two very distinct phases in his career, but after seeing his new movie The Master, and thinking about it in relation to 2007's There Will Be Blood, I'm left unable to draw any other conclusion. I've been a fan of Anderson's from the beginning, and I feel no conflict in continuing to love his first three films -- Hard Eight, Boogie Nights, and Magnolia -- while regarding each of them as very much the work of a young man. This stands to reason, as Anderson was a young man when he made them: 26 when Hard Eight came out, 29 for Magnolia, and then after a three year gap -- not so long in the grand scheme of things -- we got Punch-Drunk Love, a superb film. No more or less superb than what had come before, I'd say, but gone now was the sprawl of characters and storylines that seemed like it might be his calling card after Hard Eight, gone was sometimes stretched-thin plotting that seemed like it existed only because Anderson thought it should (I'm thinking mainly of the middle of Hard Eight here), gone was the flashy stylistic debt to Scorsese and, save for a nod or two towards Popeye, Altman. And in fact Punch-Drunk Love is very specifically a film about a man who, while professionally okay, was a social mess, a child who understood he should have gained something more in the years he's lived, and is frustrated to the point of violence that he hasn't. It's that among other things, but it's also that.
What it all really boils down to is style, both visually and narratively, and there's an unstructured looseness to Punch-Drunk Love that is as much to its favor as the almost mathematic precision of storytelling was to Magnolia. There was also a lot more empty space, and silence, and sunlight that wasn't necessarily warm but white and desert-like. California was starting to look more blasted than it had in his earlier films. There was somehow a new texture to everything. Even as Punch-Drunk Love exploited Anderson's sharp comedic instincts in the way that Hard Eight and Boogie Nights had (and for me, those moments are Boogie Nights at its best), there's a sense that something is being left behind, and Anderson was emerging from under the shelter of his influences and creating something that was very much his own. This would perhaps help explain why his daring, sinister, weird There Will Be Blood, Anderson's next film, five years down the road, feels, in the best possible way, like the work of, if not a different person, than at least a different artist.
Then, some years down the road in 2012, The Master was, if anything, weirder and more daring. Maybe not more sinister, but that sort of thing is really more dependent on the subject at hand, and the subject at hand in There Will Be Blood, if I may be permitted to boil down that unclassifiable film into something easily digestible, is misanthropy. And as twisted as The Master can be, it's not misanthropic. Some level of misanthropy might have been assumed, given that everyone who hadn't actually made the movie (this obviously includes myself) possessed an undeniable certainty that the primary goal of The Master was to blow the lid off of Scientology, whose lid was blown long ago in any case, but the prospect that Anderson would dramatize that lid-blowing process, and use his frequent collaborator and no-fooling great actor Philip Seymour Hoffman as the film's version of Scientology's mysterious, pulp science fiction writing con artist L. Ron Hubbard was simply too wonderful, and made it impossible for anyone to credit the early protests (not vehement in tone, but more in the "wait and you'll see what we mean" mode) from Anderson and Hoffman that that wasn't exactly what The Master was going to be.
They were right, of course, up to a point. Which isn't to say there was any dishonesty in those protests, but more that while The Master certainly doesn't depict The Cause, the film's Scientology-like cult religion, in a positive light, Anderson also hasn't made the muckraking expose' that we all for some reason or another thought we wanted from him. No, what it is is this: well, no, hold on. What it's about, in terms of story, is this: Joaquin Phoenix plays Freddie Quell, a former Navy man and veteran of World War II who, when we first meet him, is as messed up a human being as one can imagine existing outside of the prison system. He seems irredeemably laser-focused on two things, sex and booze, the sex taking the form of molesting the naked figure of a woman his fellow sailors have playfully built with sand, past the point of any reasonable joke, and then later masturbating on the beach, not really out of sight of anyone at all, but his back is turned so maybe that counts, and the booze manifesting as moonshine of his own concoction, using whatever was handy, which, in the civilian world, tends to mean things like paint thinner and photo emulsifier. We see Freddie bounce through a couple of jobs, including one as a portrait photographer at a department store that ends when he becomes weirdly aggressive, and finally violent, towards a customer, and another as a cabbage harvester among migrant workers, one of whom he almost kills with his hideous booze. Anderson depicts all of this with no connective tissue. We aren't shown how he arrived at the cabbage farm from the city where he worked in the department store, and we don't see how he gets from the cabbage farm to docks where he will stowaway on a yacht, where he meets Hoffman's Lancaster Dodd. The occasional narrative strain of Hard Eight, the need to get his characters in trouble and just hammer out some scenario that will allow the ending to make sense, drops away here. I don't know if Anderson feels any relief in this new, cut-to-the-bone narrative style, this method of writing and filming the parts that are vital and leaving the pedantic continuity concerns for the birds, but it's a curiously thrilling relief for me as an audience member, and inspiring in a way it would be unseemly to get into here.
Anyway, Anderson makes it clear that among Freddie's problems is a rough bout of post-traumatic stress disorder, but I've seen some critics basically say "That's what's wrong with Freddie, now, moving on..." but there's clearly much more wrong with the man than that. The war perhaps freed his mangled brain to act as it had always dreamed to, but there's actual on-screen evidence that the war was just part of it. Whatever difference that makes to you ā it makes a lot to me, as taking in all the evidence makes it much harder (and this is crucial) to hang Freddieās frightening instability on any one peg ā Joaquin Phoenix plays Freddie as a bent, scarred, hungry, scrabbling little creature, or a rat who, in addition to being a rat, also dimly understands that he is losing his mind. Itās this understanding that drives him towards bottles of paint thinner, which, I can only assume, obliterates far more of what youād want obliterated, and never mind the path itās rotting through your guts, than anything youād be able to find in a liquor store. Itās an astonishing performance in any case, one I donāt think I believed Phoenix, who before this was a very obviously talented actor, was capable of. Itās a big performance, too, like Daniel Day-Lewisās in There Will Be Blood, though in the body of a character who is considerably less sophisticated, articulate, or industrious. But the hunch of Day-Lewisās Plainview at the end of that earlier film is mirrored, which is not to say copied, in every step and every second of Phoenixās Freddie in The Master. Plainview may have gotten there with regular booze, but heād also been working at it much longer.
But perhaps Quell has found some kind of salvation on Lancaster Doddās yacht. The yacht is sailing at the moment because Doddās daughter Elizabeth (Ambyr Childers) is getting married (Dodd himself is performing the ceremony), so Freddie has stumbled already into what would appear to be a relatively high class celebration, where there is booze, and has, against all odds, been accepted. Freddie wakes up from a blackout and is ushered by a young woman into Doddās cabin, where Dodd tells him about a conversation theyād had the night before that Freddie doesnāt remember, something to do with Quell offering to work for him, and Dodd, seeing the damage and on-the-brink psychology radiating from Freddieās entire body, invites him into his cult. Because letās not beat around the bush here. Anderson doesnāt, as that word is actually used at one point in a terrific scene later on where an outsider (Christopher Evan Welch) overhearing Doddās line of nonsense grills Dodd with all the civility and reason he can muster, and it turns out to be just a hair too much for Dodd to bear. Iāve seen some talk that The Master treats the idea of this fringe, cult religion with ambiguity, implying that its benefits as a system of belief or as a guide for oneās life are not commented on one way or another. I think this is exactly wrong. Thereās quite a lot of philosophical space between the outright, hammer-on-nail condemnation we all thought The Master was going to dish out and a non-committal āWell who can say if such things work?ā, and The Master falls very clearly in the negative area. It doesnāt outright condemn, which may be the issue here, but it shows The Cause failing to work. But Iām pretty sure Iām getting to that.
Along with Doddās little minx of a daughter and her new true-believer husband (Rami Malek) the main cast is filled out by Amy Adams as Peggy, Doddās wife. Adamsās performance is very strong, and sure to be overshadowed by Phoenix and Hoffman (about whom more etc.), but Iād say of the three leads hers is easily the most subtle. It took me a while to get any sort of fix on her, and I think this is a side effect of how Amy Adams normally is in films ā prim, usually, sweet, often, sometimes feisty, but good, and good-hearted. All of these things she certainly seems to be as we get rolling, and she welcomes Freddie Quell onto her family yacht, and invites him to eat with her, and tells him that he has inspired her husband ā who in this initial phase of his relationship with Freddie regards him as an experiment through which he can prove his theories, and also as someone who makes crazy-strong booze that Dodd quite enjoys drinking himself ā to write more than sheās ever seen him write. So sheās a nice lady, apparently, though youād have to also think a somewhat naĆÆve one ā how else to explain how this outwardly smart woman could devote herself to a man who preaches past lives, theories on an Earth that is trillions rather than billions of years old, and so on? But as the film goes on, sheās revealed to be somewhat more prickly than that. Iāve seen her described as a Lady Macbeth figure, though this must be counted as a stretch, unless your definition of a Lady Macbeth figure is broad enough to include a woman who isnāt always nice to everybody. Peggy does have her own agenda, but within the world of the film, and more to the point of her family, both marital and biological as well as the family of The Cause, itās an agenda that she believes will benefit many. She also plots, but plotting to get your husband as well as your new friend to stop drinking paint thinner falls in my book somewhere short of regicide. Still, she does become rather unpleasant by the filmās end, as she grows to disdain the outside world that she views as being filled with ignorant people who want only to mock and destroy The Cause, and hardens to it as all successful cults eventually must.
As the world Anderson is depicting in The Master expands, which in this case means only that heās expanding to more fully show the world of The Cause and the people who inhabit it, other viewpoints into Dodd and his work are allowed some brief but key introductions. With them they bring cracks to The Cause and Doddās faƧade, but the only progress toward anyone seeing through this madness is communicated by Anderson through the reactions Freddie, and even Dodd, have to these moments. Doddās son (Jesse Plemons) says to Freddie that his father is making everything up as he goes along, and shortly thereafter, when Freddie and Dodd are carted off to jail together, Freddieās anger and frustration spills out, and in his tirade he repeats these same words. Later, when Bill, a long-time advocate of Dodd and his work (Kevin J. OāConnor), confides to Freddie that he thinks Doddās new book ā the first being The Cause, this second entitled The Split Saber -- is āshitā, Freddie attacks him. Meanwhile Dodd, who has already shown his inability to deal with someone who demands that he explain himself (I did briefly flirt with calling this post Pigfuck!), finds himself, in the same sequence of scenes during which Freddie assaults Bill, gently cornered by long-time friend Helen Sullivan (Laura Dern), who is confused and concerned by a change in wording found in the new book, which she is smart enough to understand changes pretty much the entire basis of their shared beliefs. Dodd handles this moment poorly. So while Andersonās mission is to not furiously dismantle Scientology, or cults similar to it, he does understand that common sense can take whatās laid before it and do the job perfectly well all by itself. These three moments, which Iāve described in the order they occur in the film, depict levels of disillusion. Freddie is easily won back (heās very susceptible to any number of things), Bill was merely disappointed in the actual book, not in Doddās theories, whereas Helenā¦sheās probably on her way out. Maybe not for a while yet, but she canāt have walked away from her conversation with her messiah feeling particularly bolstered. Regardless, this is a superb scene, one that Laura Dern plays very well, but Hoffmanās the show. Dodd is an ideal character for him, as it lets him do just about everything an actor could want to do, from humor to rage to despair, but Dodd is a man who has to keep it together, and heās starting to have trouble. If thereās some ambiguity in how The Master regards The Cause, it shows through how Anderson writes Dodd. I think thereās some reason to believe that Dodd is not merely a charlatan, but might be someone who actually believes this nonsense ā might, in fact, not realize that it is nonsense. If he doesnāt for most of the film, though, heās beginning to, and his conversation with Dern could be the moment when the balloon pops.
This section of the film, which is a long one that begins roughly at the point when Dodd and his people arrive at the home of Dernās character, is when The Master begins to gain structure. Prior to this, the film was intentionally aimless, but here some specifics of The Cause and of Doddās methods begin to take shape, and Freddie begins his training, or schooling, or whatever youād want to call walking across a room from a wall to a window and describing each over and over again for what appears to be hours, in earnest. The aimlessness of Freddieās life, which the film adopted as its ephemeral construction, now hardens into some kind of purpose: The Betterment of Freddie Quell. Itās after this section that many people whoāve seen the movie believe The Master begins to lose its way. And the film does become more willowy once the disenchantment sets in, but this is because the purpose has once again scattered into aimlessness. Freddie may be slow on the uptake, but heās able to find a source of some kind of momentum in his life by very consciously breaking away from Dodd during one of his especially ridiculous and pointless exercises. The Cause may have given Freddie the boost ā essentially, the idea -- to take the step he takes towards the end of the film, but nobody, including Dodd (Freddieās only friend, as Dodd insists, and this may in fact be true) ever told him to actually go do the thing he should have done years ago. To do that would be to tell a member of their cult to contact the outside world for reasons other than to proselytize, and this is something that Dodd, and especially Peggy, cannot have. If Freddie is to leave one of the various places The Cause calls home to do something besides furthering The Cause, then Peggy would just as soon cut him loose. And itās true that there is some reason, some small reason, for hoping that Freddie might not be a lost cause. Itās worth noting, I think, that for all of Freddieās obsession with sex, heās only shown actually having it once, near the end, and the experience seems to be a pleasant one for both parties ā Iām not at all convinced this is routinely the outcome for Freddie in these situations. This, of course, being after heās cut ties, or ties have been cut for him, from Dodd. And itās Dodd heās separating from, more than The Cause. The men were close, and when they part for good, in a strange scene involving Dodd singing āSlow Boat to China,ā Freddie is moved, though I doubt he could explain why (I also doubt that I could explain why). But then itās back to aimlessness, as we began. However, itās not the film that becomes aimless, as some have contended, but Freddie who has returned to that state. This is the structure. Itās hard enough for a filmmaker to let go of the architecture of traditional cinematic storytelling, but if anything itās harder for the audience. That is, if the film doesnāt announce itself as such. Something by David Lynch, or perhaps Abbas Kiarostamiās Certified Copy can be more easily absorbed for what they are because they present themselves as that thing, or at least clue us in early enough. But Anderson is playing a different game, building a film that appears to be a Film As We Know It, but isnāt actually ā itās one that, like its protagonist, skips and drifts along. Mind you, this is no easier for me. Just in writing this review, in trying to weave plot summary into all the stuff Iām trying to bring to this ā I donāt know, analysis or whatever ā I actually thought to myself at one point āMy God, I still have them on the yacht! I have to get them off the yacht!ā This is Andersonās business, though, not mine, and he gets them off the yacht with no trouble.
The film ends on a beach shot that could be regarded as gentle, if we hadnāt seen Freddie in that exact position earlier, when his psychological future was considerably less rosy. Not that itās especially rosy by the end, either. His one attempt to step away from The Cause didnāt go as heād hoped, and all thatās left in his mind to deal with everything banging around up there is what Dodd taught him. The sad part is that at the end he doesnāt really understand that everything he went through with Dodd didnāt work. But it didnāt work. It couldnāt work.
Coincidentally, I rewatched Alex Gibney's "Going Clear" just this morning, so I was primed for an anti-cult tirade, which your essay was not, thankfully. I need to rewatch "The Master" too, but the first time I did I came away suspecting that for someone who is a big a mess as Freddie Quells, The Cause might have actually kept him from becoming something even worse... no matter how stupid the belief construct is that enabled this faint accomplishment.